刘禹同关于安理会苏丹制裁委员会专家小组年度报告的声明（汉英对照）

常驻联合国媒体ICP(Inner City Press)记者马修·拉塞尔·李问：路透社援引安理会一名匿名外交官的话报道称，最近联合国苏丹制裁委员会专家小组的年度报告称，在苏丹达尔富尔袭击联合国和非盟维和人员现场发现了中国制造的弹药，而中方正试图阻止该委员会根据惯例公布专家小组报告。请问中国常驻联合国代表团对此有何评论？

<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> 

Question by Mr. Matthew Russell Lee with the Inner City Press: Reuters reported that, according to a Security Council diplomat, the latest report of the Panel of Experts on Sudan says a dozen brands of bullet casings found at sites of attacks on U.N./African Union peacekeepers in Darfur came from China, and that China has tried to block the publication of the report. Does the Chinese Mission have any comment?

答：安理会苏丹制裁委员会专家小组的报告存在严重瑕疵。报告多处内容缺乏事实依据和确凿证据，结论模棱两可，甚至基于猜测和假设。这不符合安理会关于专家小组应负责任、客观、中立、专业开展工作的要求。专家小组每年耗费联合国大量经费和资源，其工作应该改进。

Answer: The latest report of the Panel of Experts on Sudan has serious drawbacks. A number of references in the report are not based on facts and lack of solid evidence. Some of the conclusions of the report are vague and unclear. Some are even based on the Panel’ s own conjecture and presumption. This is not consistent with the requirements of the Security Council that the Panel of Experts should carry out its work in a responsible, objective, impartial and professional manner. The Panel of Experts uses a large amount of UN budget and resources every year. It should improve its performance.

中国政府对军品出口一贯采取慎重、负责的态度，也一贯遵守安理会决议。目前中国约有800名维和士兵部署在苏丹，我们也高度重视中国维和人员的安全。路透社援引安理会成员国外交官所谈内容既同事实不符，也有违基本常识，不合逻辑。这个外交官连国家名字都不敢讲，显然对自己所谈没有信心，不具可信度。我不想猜测其消息来源，这种过时了的小伎俩，只能反映出某些势力对发展中国家抱有的传统偏见。

China takes a prudent and responsible attitude towards its arms export and has always fulfilled its obligations under Security Council resolutions. Around 800 Chinese peacekeepers are currently deployed in Sudan. China attaches great importance to their safety and security. What was said by the so-called Security Council diplomat as quoted by the Reuters is not inline with the fact, illogical and lacks common sense. The diplomat was even afraid of disclosing the name of his/her own country, which clearly demonstrates that the diplomat has no confidence in what he/she said and he/she is not credible. I don’t want to presume who has provided the Reuters with the above mentioned information. Such old-fashioned trick only testifies to the stereotyped prejudice against the developing countries.